linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two cleanups for Sphinx conf.py

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170908101026.32969fee@lwn.net>
Date:   Fri, 8 Sep 2017 10:10:26 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two cleanups for Sphinx conf.py

On Sun,  3 Sep 2017 16:12:44 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:

> Those patches are just cleanups for Documentation/conf.py. 
> 
> The first one removes a package usage directive for a LateX package
> that it is not used. 
> 
> The second one moves some LaTeX preamble code that it is used only
> on Sphinx 1.4 and 1.5 to a separate if. On Sphinx 1.6, the macros there
> are silently ignored. While the conf.py becomes a little bit more complex,
> it clearly marks the backward-compatible code, with IMHO, it is a
> good idea, specially as some day, we may drop support for older Sphinx
> versions.
> 
> None of those patches are mandatory. Feel free to apply any time you
> want (or discard them, if you don't thing it is worth).

OK, these are applied (and the adjustbox one too).

PDF generation seems to work pretty well at the moment, with one
exception: I don't get a table of contents in any of the files (just a
blank page saying "Contents").  Are you seeing something different?

Thanks,

jon