[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170908193806.tgqxfltnalkuyawz@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: typec: tcpm: Validate source and sink caps
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:27:27AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 1; i < nr_pdo; i++) {
> >> + if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) < pdo_type(pdo[i - 1])) {
> >> + tcpm_log_force(port,
> >> + " err:PDOs should be in the following order: Fixed; Battery; Variable. pdo index:%u"
> >> + , i);
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> + } else if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) == pdo_type(pdo[i - 1])) {
> >
> > The else statement isn't needed. Pull this in one indent level.
>
> Just to clarify, you are suggesting,
> "if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) == pdo_type(pdo[i - 1]))"
> instead of "else if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) == pdo_type(pdo[i - 1]))"
> right ?
>
Sorry. My bad. We can't pull it in an indent level.
Thanks for answering the rest of my questions as well. It's clear to
me now.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists