[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1709081612490.19719@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jgross@...e.com, Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] xen/pvcalls: implement socket command and handle
events
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 06:57 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Send a PVCALLS_SOCKET command to the backend, use the masked
> > req_prod_pvt as req_id. This way, req_id is guaranteed to be between 0
> > and PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING. We already have a slot in the rsp array
> > ready for the response, and there cannot be two outstanding responses
> > with the same req_id.
> >
> > Wait for the response by waiting on the inflight_req waitqueue and
> > check for the req_id field in rsp[req_id]. Use atomic accesses and
> > barriers to read the field. Note that the barriers are simple smp
> > barriers (as opposed to virt barriers) because they are for internal
> > frontend synchronization, not frontend<->backend communication.
> >
> > Once a response is received, clear the corresponding rsp slot by setting
> > req_id to PVCALLS_INVALID_ID. Note that PVCALLS_INVALID_ID is invalid
> > only from the frontend point of view. It is not part of the PVCalls
> > protocol.
> >
> > pvcalls_front_event_handler is in charge of copying responses from the
> > ring to the appropriate rsp slot. It is done by copying the body of the
> > response first, then by copying req_id atomically. After the copies,
> > wake up anybody waiting on waitqueue.
> >
> > pvcallss_lock protects accesses to the ring.
> >
> > Create a new struct sock_mapping and convert the pointer into an
> > uint64_t and use it as id for the new socket to pass to the backend. The
> > struct will be fully initialized later on connect or bind. In this patch
> > the struct sock_mapping is empty, the fields will be added by the next
> > patch.
> >
> > sock->sk->sk_send_head is not used for ip sockets: reuse the field to
> > store a pointer to the struct sock_mapping corresponding to the socket.
> > This way, we can easily get the struct sock_mapping from the struct
> > socket.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@...reto.com>
> > CC: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
> > CC: jgross@...e.com
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 119
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h | 8 +++
> > 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > index 2afe36d..7c4a7cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
> > #include <xen/xenbus.h>
> > #include <xen/interface/io/pvcalls.h>
> > +#include "pvcalls-front.h"
> > +
> > #define PVCALLS_INVALID_ID UINT_MAX
> > #define PVCALLS_RING_ORDER XENBUS_MAX_RING_GRANT_ORDER
> > #define PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING __CONST_RING_SIZE(xen_pvcalls,
> > XEN_PAGE_SIZE)
> > @@ -38,11 +40,128 @@ struct pvcalls_bedata {
> > };
> > static struct xenbus_device *pvcalls_front_dev;
> > +struct sock_mapping {
> > + bool active_socket;
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + struct socket *sock;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline int get_request(struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata, int *req_id)
> > +{
> > + *req_id = bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt & (RING_SIZE(&bedata->ring) - 1);
> > + if (RING_FULL(&bedata->ring) ||
> > + READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[*req_id].req_id) != PVCALLS_INVALID_ID)
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static irqreturn_t pvcalls_front_event_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > {
> > + struct xenbus_device *dev = dev_id;
> > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> > + struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp;
> > + uint8_t *src, *dst;
> > + int req_id = 0, more = 0, done = 0;
> > +
> > + if (dev == NULL)
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +
> > + bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
> > + if (bedata == NULL)
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +
> > +again:
> > + while (RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&bedata->ring)) {
> > + rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&bedata->ring, bedata->ring.rsp_cons);
> > +
> > + req_id = rsp->req_id;
> > + dst = (uint8_t *)&bedata->rsp[req_id] + sizeof(rsp->req_id);
> > + src = (uint8_t *)rsp + sizeof(rsp->req_id);
> > + memcpy(dst, src, sizeof(*rsp) - sizeof(rsp->req_id));
> > + /*
> > + * First copy the rest of the data, then req_id. It is
> > + * paired with the barrier when accessing bedata->rsp.
> > + */
> > + smp_wmb();
> > + WRITE_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id, rsp->req_id);
> > +
> > + done = 1;
> > + bedata->ring.rsp_cons++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + RING_FINAL_CHECK_FOR_RESPONSES(&bedata->ring, more);
> > + if (more)
> > + goto again;
> > + if (done)
> > + wake_up(&bedata->inflight_req);
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> > +int pvcalls_front_socket(struct socket *sock)
> > +{
> > + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> > + struct sock_mapping *map = NULL;
> > + struct xen_pvcalls_request *req;
> > + int notify, req_id, ret;
> > +
> > + if (!pvcalls_front_dev)
> > + return -EACCES;
> > + /*
> > + * PVCalls only supports domain AF_INET,
> > + * type SOCK_STREAM and protocol 0 sockets for now.
> > + *
> > + * Check socket type here, AF_INET and protocol checks are done
> > + * by the caller.
> > + */
> > + if (sock->type != SOCK_STREAM)
> > + return -ENOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
> > +
> > + map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (map == NULL)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + /*
> > + * sock->sk->sk_send_head is not used for ip sockets: reuse the
> > + * field to store a pointer to the struct sock_mapping
> > + * corresponding to the socket. This way, we can easily get the
> > + * struct sock_mapping from the struct socket.
>
>
> Is this a safe assumption? Is it conceivable that at some point in the future
> sk_send_head might become used?
I don't think there is any risk of sk_send_head being used anytime soon:
among all the protocols supported under net/, sk_send_head is only used
by dccp.
> > + */
> > + WRITE_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_send_head, (void *)map);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> > + list_add_tail(&map->list, &bedata->socket_mappings);
> > +
> > + ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> > + return ret;
> What is happening to the mapping you've linked above? Should it be unlinked
> and freed? (or defer its creation until we've got a request slot?)
Yes, you are right.
> > + }
> > + req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
> > + req->req_id = req_id;
> > + req->cmd = PVCALLS_SOCKET;
> > + req->u.socket.id = (uint64_t) map;
> > + req->u.socket.domain = AF_INET;
> > + req->u.socket.type = SOCK_STREAM;
> > + req->u.socket.protocol = 0;
>
> IPPROTO_IP?
Yes, thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists