lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 15:23:11 +0930 From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> To: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rpurdie@...ys.net, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, pavel@....cz, Brandon Wyman <bjwyman@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] leds: pca955x: Don't invert requested value in pca955x_gpio_set_value() On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org> wrote: > On 09/01/2017 07:38 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote: >> Rework leds-pca955x so that we avoid the incorrect inversion and clarify >> the semantics with respect to GPIO. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> > > Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org> I gave this a spin on our 'witherspoon' system and the LEDs responded as expected. Tested-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> Cheers, Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists