[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:58:28 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: typec: tcpm: Validate source and sink caps
On 09/09/2017 09:54 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/08/2017 12:13 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:29:52AM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 06:22:13PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
>>>>> The source and sink caps should follow the following rules.
>>>>> This patch validates whether the src_caps/snk_caps adheres
>>>>> to it.
>>>>>
>>>>> 6.4.1 Capabilities Message
>>>>> A Capabilities message (Source Capabilities message or Sink
>>>>> Capabilities message) shall have at least one Power
>>>>> Data Object for vSafe5V. The Capabilities message shall also
>>>>> contain the sending Port’s information followed by up to
>>>>> 6 additional Power Data Objects. Power Data Objects in a
>>>>> Capabilities message shall be sent in the following order:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. The vSafe5V Fixed Supply Object shall always be the first object.
>>>>> 2. The remaining Fixed Supply Objects, if present, shall be sent
>>>>> in voltage order; lowest to highest.
>>>>> 3. The Battery Supply Objects, if present shall be sent in Minimum
>>>>> Voltage order; lowest to highest.
>>>>> 4. The Variable Supply (non-battery) Objects, if present, shall be
>>>>> sent in Minimum Voltage order; lowest to highest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Errors in source/sink_caps of the local port will prevent
>>>>> the port registration. Whereas, errors in source caps of partner
>>>>> device would only log them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@...gle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/staging/typec/pd.h | 2 +
>>>>> drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>> drivers/staging/typec/tcpm.h | 16 +++----
>>>>> 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Before you add more stuff to this driver, what is needed to get it out
>>>> of staging? That would be more useful to do now, right?
>>>
>>> Actually not adding more features here. There was a bug where
>>> the phone wasnt charging at the highest possible power output,
>>> came up with the these patches while debugging that issue.
>>
>> Ok, but again, when is this going to get out of staging?
>>
> I have a set of patches ready to do just that. It only moves tcpm - tcpci
> is still untested as far as I know, and fusb302 has unapproved devicetree
> properties.
>
Actually, the dt properties are Acked by Rob, so we can move that driver as well
(TODO is a bit misleading there). I'll add that to the patch series.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists