[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 17:30:09 -0700
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] ti_sci: Use %pS printk format for direct addresses
On 9/8/2017 4:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 20:27-20170906, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Use the %pS printk format for printing symbols from direct addresses.
>> This is important for the ia64, ppc64 and parisc64 architectures, while on
>> other architectures there is no difference between %pS and %pF.
>> Fix it for consistency across the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
>> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>
> OK with me. Thanks for doing the patch.
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
>
> Santosh, Tero: maybe queue for an rc or later cycle, I think?
>
Doesn't look a rc type fix so can wait for next one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists