[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170910213324.GA24252@pluto.fritz.box>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 23:41:58 +0200
From: Gerd Gerats <gerd.gerats.lkml@....de>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
dvhart@...radead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] futex: hashbucket as list of futex instead of waiters
When using futex as a condition variable, for example: to manage a
threadpool, there may be a lot of threads inside the futex_wait to sleep on
this futex. The futex_hash_bucket consists therefore of many struct futex_q
for the same futex.
On bad luck another futex, used as mutex, hashed into the same bucket.
Every futex_wake on this mutex, has to scan the whole chain of above waiter
to find the struct futex_q for this mutex. For non-unusual threadpool sizes
of more than 20, this should be a considerable effort.
I therefore suggest to include in the hash-bucketchain only one struct
futex_q per futex and to queue additional waiter in an extrachain at the
'top' futex_q entry. Thus different futex are isolated from each other, the
cost of a hash collision is reduced.
To show the idea, I added a sample patch. Here, the plist is exchanged for
a futex-specific implementation. kernel/pring.h is certainly not not the
right place.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Gerats <gerd.gerats@....de>
---
kernel/futex.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
kernel/pring.h | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/pring.h
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 357348a6cf6b..5598c4b1ad96 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
#include "locking/rtmutex_common.h"
+#include "pring.h"
+
/*
* READ this before attempting to hack on futexes!
*
@@ -229,7 +231,7 @@ struct futex_pi_state {
* we can wake only the relevant ones (hashed queues may be shared).
*
* A futex_q has a woken state, just like tasks have TASK_RUNNING.
- * It is considered woken when plist_node_empty(&q->list) || q->lock_ptr == 0.
+ * It is considered woken when futexq_lists_empty(&q) || q->lock_ptr == 0.
* The order of wakeup is always to make the first condition true, then
* the second.
*
@@ -237,7 +239,8 @@ struct futex_pi_state {
* the rt_mutex code. See unqueue_me_pi().
*/
struct futex_q {
- struct plist_node list;
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct pring_node ring;
struct task_struct *task;
spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
@@ -262,7 +265,7 @@ static const struct futex_q futex_q_init = {
struct futex_hash_bucket {
atomic_t waiters;
spinlock_t lock;
- struct plist_head chain;
+ struct list_head chain;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
/*
@@ -745,13 +748,78 @@ static struct futex_q *futex_top_waiter(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
{
struct futex_q *this;
- plist_for_each_entry(this, &hb->chain, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(this, &hb->chain, list) {
if (match_futex(&this->key, key))
return this;
}
return NULL;
}
+/**
+ * futexq_init() - initialize futex_q chain fields
+ * @q The futex_q to initialize
+ * @prio: priority
+ */
+static void futexq_init(struct futex_q *q, int prio)
+{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->list);
+ pring_init(&q->ring, prio);
+}
+
+/**
+ * futexq_add() - Enqueue the futex_q on the futex_hash_bucket
+ * @q: The futex_q to enqueue
+ * @hb: The destination hash bucket
+ */
+static void futexq_add(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+{
+ struct futex_q *top;
+
+ top = futex_top_waiter(hb, &q->key);
+ if (top) {
+ if (pring_add(&q->ring, &top->ring) == &q->ring)
+ list_replace_init(&top->list, &q->list);
+ } else {
+ list_add_tail(&q->list, &hb->chain);
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * futexq_del() - Remove the futex_q from its futex_hash_bucket
+ * @q: The futex_q to unqueue
+ * @hb: hash bucket to remove from
+ */
+static void futexq_del(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
+{
+ struct futex_q *next;
+
+ if (pring_is_singular(&q->ring)) {
+ list_del_init(&q->list);
+ } else {
+ next = pring_next_entry(q, ring);
+ if (!list_empty(&q->list))
+ list_replace_init(&q->list, &next->list);
+ pring_del(&q->ring);
+ }
+}
+
+static inline bool futexq_lists_empty(struct futex_q *q)
+{
+ return list_empty(&q->list) && pring_is_singular(&q->ring);
+}
+
+static inline struct futex_q *futexq_next_or_null(struct futex_q *q)
+{
+ struct futex_q *next = pring_next_entry(q, ring);
+
+ return list_empty(&next->list) ? next : 0;
+}
+
+#define futex_for_each_match_safe(pos, n, hb, key) \
+ for (pos = futex_top_waiter(hb, key); \
+ pos && ({ n = futexq_next_or_null(pos); 1; }); \
+ pos = n)
+
static int cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(u32 *curval, u32 __user *uaddr,
u32 uval, u32 newval)
{
@@ -1352,11 +1420,11 @@ static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q)
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr))
- || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)))
+ || WARN_ON(futexq_lists_empty(q)))
return;
hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock);
- plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
+ futexq_del(q, hb);
hb_waiters_dec(hb);
}
@@ -1384,7 +1452,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
* is written, without taking any locks. This is possible in the event
* of a spurious wakeup, for example. A memory barrier is required here
* to prevent the following store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the
- * plist_del in __unqueue_futex().
+ * futexq_del/pring_del in __unqueue_futex().
*/
smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}
@@ -1521,21 +1589,19 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb->chain, list) {
- if (match_futex (&this->key, &key)) {
- if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- break;
- }
+ futex_for_each_match_safe(this, next, hb, &key) {
+ if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
- /* Check if one of the bits is set in both bitsets */
- if (!(this->bitset & bitset))
- continue;
+ /* Check if one of the bits is set in both bitsets */
+ if (!(this->bitset & bitset))
+ continue;
- mark_wake_futex(&wake_q, this);
- if (++ret >= nr_wake)
- break;
- }
+ mark_wake_futex(&wake_q, this);
+ if (++ret >= nr_wake)
+ break;
}
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
@@ -1604,30 +1670,26 @@ futex_wake_op(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
goto retry;
}
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
- if (match_futex (&this->key, &key1)) {
- if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- mark_wake_futex(&wake_q, this);
- if (++ret >= nr_wake)
- break;
+ futex_for_each_match_safe(this, next, hb1, &key1) {
+ if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
+ mark_wake_futex(&wake_q, this);
+ if (++ret >= nr_wake)
+ break;
}
if (op_ret > 0) {
op_ret = 0;
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb2->chain, list) {
- if (match_futex (&this->key, &key2)) {
- if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- mark_wake_futex(&wake_q, this);
- if (++op_ret >= nr_wake2)
- break;
+ futex_for_each_match_safe(this, next, hb2, &key2) {
+ if (this->pi_state || this->rt_waiter) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
}
+ mark_wake_futex(&wake_q, this);
+ if (++op_ret >= nr_wake2)
+ break;
}
ret += op_ret;
}
@@ -1656,18 +1718,18 @@ void requeue_futex(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
{
/*
- * If key1 and key2 hash to the same bucket, no need to
+ * If key1 and key2 hash to the same bucket, we still need to
* requeue.
*/
+ futexq_del(q, hb1);
if (likely(&hb1->chain != &hb2->chain)) {
- plist_del(&q->list, &hb1->chain);
hb_waiters_dec(hb1);
hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
- plist_add(&q->list, &hb2->chain);
q->lock_ptr = &hb2->lock;
}
get_futex_key_refs(key2);
q->key = *key2;
+ futexq_add(q, hb2);
}
/**
@@ -1949,13 +2011,10 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags,
}
}
- plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
+ futex_for_each_match_safe(this, next, hb1, &key1) {
if (task_count - nr_wake >= nr_requeue)
break;
- if (!match_futex(&this->key, &key1))
- continue;
-
/*
* FUTEX_WAIT_REQEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
* be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
@@ -2110,8 +2169,8 @@ static inline void __queue_me(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
*/
prio = min(current->normal_prio, MAX_RT_PRIO);
- plist_node_init(&q->list, prio);
- plist_add(&q->list, &hb->chain);
+ futexq_init(q, prio);
+ futexq_add(q, hb);
q->task = current;
}
@@ -2396,7 +2455,7 @@ static void futex_wait_queue_me(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, struct futex_q *q,
* If we have been removed from the hash list, then another task
* has tried to wake us, and we can skip the call to schedule().
*/
- if (likely(!plist_node_empty(&q->list))) {
+ if (likely(!futexq_lists_empty(q))) {
/*
* If the timer has already expired, current will already be
* flagged for rescheduling. Only call schedule if there
@@ -2918,7 +2977,7 @@ int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
* We were woken prior to requeue by a timeout or a signal.
* Unqueue the futex_q and determine which it was.
*/
- plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
+ futexq_del(q, hb);
hb_waiters_dec(hb);
/* Handle spurious wakeups gracefully */
@@ -3495,7 +3554,7 @@ static int __init futex_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < futex_hashsize; i++) {
atomic_set(&futex_queues[i].waiters, 0);
- plist_head_init(&futex_queues[i].chain);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&futex_queues[i].chain);
spin_lock_init(&futex_queues[i].lock);
}
diff --git a/kernel/pring.h b/kernel/pring.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5821ee4797e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/pring.h
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+#ifndef _LINUX_PRING_H_
+#define _LINUX_PRING_H_
+
+/*
+ * futex specific priority-sorted ring
+ *
+ * based on include/linux/plist.h
+ *
+ * Simple ASCII art explanation:
+ *
+ * fl:futx_list
+ * pl:prio_list
+ * nl:node_list
+ *
+ * +------+
+ * | v
+ * | |fl| HEAD
+ * | ^
+ * | |
+ * | v
+ * | +--------+
+ * | +->|pl|<-+
+ * | |10| (prio)
+ * | | |
+ * | +->|nl|<-+
+ * | +--------+
+ * | ^
+ * | |
+ * | v
+ * | +------------------------------------+
+ * | +->|pl|<->|pl|<--------------->|pl|<-+
+ * | |10| |21| |21| |21| |40| (prio)
+ * | | | | | | | | | | |
+ * | +->|nl|<->|nl|<->|nl|<->|nl|<->|nl|<-+
+ * | +------------------------------------+
+ * | ^
+ * +------+
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+
+struct pring_node {
+ int prio;
+ struct list_head prio_list;
+ struct list_head node_list;
+};
+
+static void pring_init(struct pring_node *node, int prio)
+{
+ node->prio = prio;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->prio_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->node_list);
+}
+
+static inline bool pring_is_singular(struct pring_node *node)
+{
+ return list_empty(&node->node_list);
+}
+
+static void pring_del(struct pring_node *node)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&node->node_list)))
+ return;
+ if (!list_empty(&node->prio_list)) {
+ struct pring_node *next;
+
+ next = list_next_entry(node, node_list);
+ /* add the next node into prio_list */
+ if (list_empty(&next->prio_list))
+ list_add(&next->prio_list, &node->prio_list);
+ list_del_init(&node->prio_list);
+ }
+ list_del_init(&node->node_list);
+}
+
+static struct pring_node *
+pring_add(struct pring_node *node, struct pring_node *top)
+{
+ struct pring_node *iter, *prev = NULL;
+ struct list_head *node_next = &top->node_list;
+
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&node->node_list));
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&node->prio_list));
+
+ iter = top;
+
+ do {
+ if (node->prio < iter->prio) {
+ node_next = &iter->node_list;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ prev = iter;
+ iter = list_entry(iter->prio_list.next,
+ struct pring_node, prio_list);
+ } while (iter != top);
+
+ if (!prev || prev->prio != node->prio)
+ list_add_tail(&node->prio_list, &iter->prio_list);
+ list_add_tail(&node->node_list, node_next);
+
+ return prev ? top : node;
+}
+
+#define pring_next_entry(pos, member) \
+ container_of(list_next_entry(&(pos)->member, node_list), \
+ typeof(*(pos)), member)
+
+#endif
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists