linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1505025984.3224.35.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Sep 2017 02:46:24 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14

On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 11:19 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:29 AM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> >
> > IMA:
> >   - A new integrity_read file operation method, avoids races when
> >     calculating file hashes
> 
> Honestly, this seems really odd.
> 
> It documents that it needs to be called with i_rwsem held exclusively,
> and even has a lockdep assert to that effect (well, not really: the
> code claims "exclusive", but the lockdep assert does not), but I'm not
> actually seeing anybody doing it.
> 
> Quite the reverse, I just see integrity_read_file() doing filp_open()
> on the pathname and passing it to integrity_kernel_read() with no
> locking.
> 
> It really looks like just pure garbage to me. I pulled, and I'm not
> unpulling the whole thing. I don't think it's been tested, and I don't
> think it can be right.
> 
> Tell me why I'm wrong, or tell me why that garbage made it in in the
> first place?

I'm really sorry for the long delay in responding.  I've been on
vacation the last week, mostly without cell phone and very limited
wifi access. 

True, there is a side case where integrity_read_file() is being called
without first taking the i_rwsem.  This side case permits signed x509
certificates to be loaded onto the trusted IMA/EVM keyrings, without
verifying the file signature stored as security.ima/security.evm
xattrs.  Basically, the xattr signatures can not be verified until the
keys are loaded.  The main use case is embedded systems which do not
have an initramfs, but have a specially crafted init script.  It
requires enabling CONFIG_IMA_LOAD_X509 or CONFIG_EVM_LOAD_X509.  The
new VFS integrity_read() file operation method would not be called.

The main use case for the new VFS integrity_read() file operation
method is to calculate the file hash, as Christoph described.

Mimi