[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170911090014.16806-4-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:00:13 +0200
From: srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] nvmem: remove inline in drivers/nvmem/core.c
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
These two functions are defined in .c file, but called just once
(at least for now). So, the compiler will fold them into their
callers even without the "inline" markers.
However, this kind of optimization should not be done by hand.
It is compiler's judge after all.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
---
drivers/nvmem/core.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
index d12e5de..fdb8b7a 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
@@ -946,8 +946,7 @@ void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_put);
-static inline void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
- void *buf)
+static void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf)
{
u8 *p, *b;
int i, bit_offset = cell->bit_offset;
@@ -1028,8 +1027,8 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, size_t *len)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_cell_read);
-static inline void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
- u8 *_buf, int len)
+static void *nvmem_cell_prepare_write_buffer(struct nvmem_cell *cell,
+ u8 *_buf, int len)
{
struct nvmem_device *nvmem = cell->nvmem;
int i, rc, nbits, bit_offset = cell->bit_offset;
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists