linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 02/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove useless 'buf' parameter in the HW/SW cycle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1505122921-5534-3-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2017 02:41:52 -0700
From:   Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Remove useless 'buf' parameter in the HW/SW cycle

intel_spi_hw_cycle() and intel_spi_sw_cycle() don't use the parameter
'buf' at all. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
---

Changes in v2: None

 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
index e5b52e8..07626ca 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
@@ -377,8 +377,7 @@ static int intel_spi_opcode_index(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode)
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, u8 *buf,
-			      int len)
+static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, int len)
 {
 	u32 val, status;
 	int ret;
@@ -418,8 +417,7 @@ static int intel_spi_hw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, u8 *buf,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int intel_spi_sw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, u8 *buf,
-			      int len)
+static int intel_spi_sw_cycle(struct intel_spi *ispi, u8 opcode, int len)
 {
 	u32 val, status;
 	int ret;
@@ -456,9 +454,9 @@ static int intel_spi_read_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len)
 	writel(0, ispi->base + FADDR);
 
 	if (ispi->swseq)
-		ret = intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
+		ret = intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
 	else
-		ret = intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
+		ret = intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
 
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -486,8 +484,8 @@ static int intel_spi_write_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (ispi->swseq)
-		return intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
-	return intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, buf, len);
+		return intel_spi_sw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
+	return intel_spi_hw_cycle(ispi, opcode, len);
 }
 
 static ssize_t intel_spi_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from, size_t len,
-- 
2.9.2