[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEUhbmVKZwNFgBo4KewoutKkD+XZ4MySX0mNDdV6J5v+M3njOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:46:33 +0800
From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix number of protected range
registers for BYT/LPT
Hi Marek,
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 10:00 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>> The number of protected range registers is not the same on BYT/LPT/
>> BXT. GPR0 only exists on Apollo Lake and its offset is reserved on
>> other platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
>
> Can this use regmap ? What you're implementing here seems like regmap to me.
No. regmap does not apply here.
Regards,
Bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists