[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170912002528.615d0e40@alans-desktop>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:25:28 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...yncelyn.cymru>
To: Vincent Hervieux <vincent.hervieux@...il.com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, hans.verkuil@...co.com,
rvarsha016@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
fengguang.wu@...el.com, daeseok.youn@...il.com,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] staging: atomisp: activate ATOMISP2401 support
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 20:49:27 +0200
Vincent Hervieux <vincent.hervieux@...il.com> wrote:
> Currently atomisp module supports Intel's Baytrail SoC and contains
> some compilation switches to support Intel's Cherrytrail SoC instead.
> The patchset aims to :
> - 1/2: activate ATOMISP2400 or ATOMISP2401 from the menu.
> - 2/2: fix compilation errors for ATOMISP2401.
> I'm not so confident with patch 2/2, as it is only working around the non declared functions by using the 2400 path. As I couln't find any declaration/definition for the ISP2401 missing functions...So any help would be appreciated.
> Also patch 2/2 doesn't correct any cosmetic changes reported by checkpatch.pl as explained in TODO step 6.
Please don't. Right now we know what work is to be done and tested.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists