linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170911063834.GB10489@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 10 Sep 2017 23:38:34 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>,
        5ac7eace2d00eab5ae0e9fdee63e38aee6001f7c@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Security subsystem updates for 4.14

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:02:42AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> We need to differentiate between policies and x509 certificates.  In
> the policy case, they need to be signed and appraised, while in the
> x509 certificate case, the certificate itself is signed so the file
> doesn't need to be signed or verified.

How about you take this sketch over - I don't know much about the
integrity code, and it seems like you actually wrote
kernel_read_file_from_path as well - so you're at least 3 times as
qualified as I am in this area..