linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add DT bindings for Socionext UniPhier AVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170911161130.671B.4A936039@socionext.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:11:31 +0900
From:   Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dt-bindings: net: add DT bindings for Socionext UniPhier AVE

Hi Andrew,

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 16:03:22 +0200 <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> > +	eth: ethernet@...00000 {
> > +		compatible = "socionext,uniphier-ave4";
> > +		reg = <0x65000000 0x8500>;
> > +		interrupts = <0 66 4>;
> > +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ether_rgmii>;
> > +		phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > +		socionext,desc-bits = <64>;
> > +		local-mac-address = [00 00 00 00 00 00];
> > +
> > +		#address-cells = <1>;
> > +		#size-cells = <0>;
> 
> > +		ethphy: ethphy@1 {
> > +			reg = <1>;
> > +		};
> 
> 
> So you normally have an mdio node, and the phy as a children of that
> node.
> 
>        mdio {
>                 ethphy: ethernet-phy@6 {
>                         reg = <6>;
>                 };
>         };
> 
> 	Andrew

I see. I'll rewrite the binding example using mdio node.

---
Best Regards,
Kunihiko Hayashi