[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8ee0f47-fa69-3aca-6c5d-24f25505fa05@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:52:02 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
CC: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
<vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: davinci: Add PM Runtime Support
On Tuesday 12 September 2017 02:44 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12 September 2017 at 16:48, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 September 2017 07:28 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>> @@ -802,13 +821,24 @@ static int davinci_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>>> if (IS_ERR(dev->clk))
>>>> return PTR_ERR(dev->clk);
>>>> - clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk);
>>
>>> You removed clk enable here, I think it can not work if we did not
>>> open CONFIG_PM macro. I think you should keep clk enable here, and set
>>
>> What do you mean by "open CONFIG_PM macro" ?
>
> If you did not open CONFIG_PM macro, then the pm_runtime_xxx() will be
> dummy functions, but now the i2c driver can not work since you did not
> enable clock, right?
Ah, okay. I am not sure thats a concern on platforms on which this
driver is used. Without PM runtime support, most likely the platforms
will not boot and multiple drivers will fail.
Thanks,
Sekhar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists