[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <130cbd01-265e-dafe-02d1-96de4d62ff12@metafoo.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 20:12:47 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
driverdev <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
nick.desaulniers@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] Fixed IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED API to
take name as a string and added "" around names
On 09/12/2017 09:53 AM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> Hi Himanshi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@...il.com> wrote:
>> Fixed IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED API to take name as a
>> string instead of implicit conversion to string using
>> preprocessors. Added double quotes around names in
>> existing usage of IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED.
>
> Always use imperative mood in commit subject (Fix instead of Fixed).
>
> The subject should contain a tag, which describes the subsytem/files affected.
>
> I would split this patch into:
>
> 1) sysfs: iio: Introduce *_ATTR_NAMED
>
> and explain here why do we need __ATTR_NAMED and IIO_ATTR_NAMED
>
> 2) iio: Use new IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED API
>
> But of course, lets wait to see Lars and Jonathan's opinions.
Fully agreed with what you wrote.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists