| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2f2ae1bc-4093-d083-6a18-96b9aaa090c9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:15:53 -0400
From: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, axboe@...nel.dk, mpe@...erman.id.au,
keith.busch@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kashyap.desai@...adcom.com, sumit.saxena@...adcom.com,
shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: system hung up when offlining CPUs
+ linux-scsi and maintainers of megasas
When offlining CPU, I/O stops. Do you have any ideas?
On 09/07/2017 04:23 PM, YASUAKI ISHIMATSU wrote:
> Hi Mark and Christoph,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I appreciated that you fixed the issue on kvm environment.
> But the issue still occurs on physical server.
>
> Here ares irq information that I summarized megasas irqs from /proc/interrupts
> and /proc/irq/*/smp_affinity_list on my server:
>
> ---
> IRQ affinity_list IRQ_TYPE
> 42 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048576-edge megasas
> 43 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048577-edge megasas
> 44 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048578-edge megasas
> 45 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048579-edge megasas
> 46 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048580-edge megasas
> 47 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048581-edge megasas
> 48 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048582-edge megasas
> 49 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048583-edge megasas
> 50 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048584-edge megasas
> 51 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048585-edge megasas
> 52 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048586-edge megasas
> 53 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048587-edge megasas
> 54 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048588-edge megasas
> 55 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048589-edge megasas
> 56 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048590-edge megasas
> 57 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048591-edge megasas
> 58 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048592-edge megasas
> 59 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048593-edge megasas
> 60 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048594-edge megasas
> 61 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048595-edge megasas
> 62 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048596-edge megasas
> 63 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048597-edge megasas
> 64 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048598-edge megasas
> 65 0-5 IR-PCI-MSI 1048599-edge megasas
> 66 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048600-edge megasas
> 67 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048601-edge megasas
> 68 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048602-edge megasas
> 69 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048603-edge megasas
> 70 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048604-edge megasas
> 71 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048605-edge megasas
> 72 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048606-edge megasas
> 73 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048607-edge megasas
> 74 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048608-edge megasas
> 75 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048609-edge megasas
> 76 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048610-edge megasas
> 77 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048611-edge megasas
> 78 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048612-edge megasas
> 79 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048613-edge megasas
> 80 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048614-edge megasas
> 81 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048615-edge megasas
> 82 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048616-edge megasas
> 83 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048617-edge megasas
> 84 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048618-edge megasas
> 85 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048619-edge megasas
> 86 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048620-edge megasas
> 87 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048621-edge megasas
> 88 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048622-edge megasas
> 89 24-29 IR-PCI-MSI 1048623-edge megasas
> ---
>
> In my server, IRQ#66-89 are sent to CPU#24-29. And if I offline CPU#24-29,
> I/O does not work, showing the following messages.
>
> ---
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] tag#1 task abort called for scmd(ffff8820574d7560)
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] tag#1 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 0d e8 cf 78 00 00 08 00
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: task abort: FAILED scmd(ffff8820574d7560)
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] tag#0 task abort called for scmd(ffff882057426560)
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: Write(10) 2a 00 0d 58 37 00 00 00 08 00
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: task abort: FAILED scmd(ffff882057426560)
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: target reset called for scmd(ffff8820574d7560)
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] tag#1 megasas: target reset FAILED!!
> [...] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] tag#0 Controller reset is requested due to IO timeout
> [...] SCSI command pointer: (ffff882057426560) SCSI host state: 5 SCSI
> [...] IO request frame:
> [...]
> <snip>
> [...]
> [...] megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: [ 0]waiting for 2 commands to complete for scsi0
> [...] INFO: task auditd:1200 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [...] Not tainted 4.13.0+ #15
> [...] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [...] auditd D 0 1200 1 0x00000000
> [...] Call Trace:
> [...] __schedule+0x28d/0x890
> [...] schedule+0x36/0x80
> [...] io_schedule+0x16/0x40
> [...] wait_on_page_bit_common+0x109/0x1c0
> [...] ? page_cache_tree_insert+0xf0/0xf0
> [...] __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x127/0x190
> [...] ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xd1/0x100
> [...] file_write_and_wait_range+0x60/0xb0
> [...] xfs_file_fsync+0x67/0x1d0 [xfs]
> [...] vfs_fsync_range+0x3d/0xb0
> [...] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
> [...] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20
> [...] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
> [...] RIP: 0033:0x7f0bd9633d2d
> [...] RSP: 002b:00007f0bd751ed30 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
> [...] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005590566d0080 RCX: 00007f0bd9633d2d
> [...] RDX: 00005590566d1260 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
> [...] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000017
> [...] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000
> [...] R13: 00007f0bd751f9c0 R14: 00007f0bd751f700 R15: 0000000000000000
> ---
>
> Thanks,
> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> On 08/21/2017 09:37 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 21/08/17 14:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Can you try the patch below please?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> From d5f59cb7a629de8439b318e1384660e6b56e7dd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:24:11 +0200
>>> Subject: virtio_pci: fix cpu affinity support
>>>
>>> Commit 0b0f9dc5 ("Revert "virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for
>>> virtqueues"") removed the adjustment of the pre_vectors for the virtio
>>> MSI-X vector allocation which was added in commit fb5e31d9 ("virtio:
>>> allow drivers to request IRQ affinity when creating VQs"). This will
>>> lead to an incorrect assignment of MSI-X vectors, and potential
>>> deadlocks when offlining cpus.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>>> Fixes: 0b0f9dc5 ("Revert "virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues")
>>> Reported-by: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>
>>
>> Just gave it a go on an arm64 VM, and the behaviour seems much saner
>> (the virtio queue affinity now spans the whole system).
>>
>> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> M.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists