[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23b700aa-ed37-1081-d980-4073804f293b@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:01:25 +0800
From: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: put the driver tag of nxt rq before first one is
requeued
Hi ming
On 09/12/2017 06:23 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> @@ -1029,14 +1029,20 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list)
>> if (list_empty(list))
>> bd.last = true;
>> else {
>> - struct request *nxt;
>> -
>> nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
>> bd.last = !blk_mq_get_driver_tag(nxt, NULL, false);
>> }
>>
>> ret = q->mq_ops->queue_rq(hctx, &bd);
>> if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE) {
>> + /*
>> + * If an I/O scheduler has been configured and we got a
>> + * driver tag for the next request already, free it again.
>> + */
>> + if (!list_empty(list)) {
>> + nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
>> + blk_mq_put_driver_tag(nxt);
>> + }
> The following way might be more simple and clean:
>
> if (nxt)
> blk_mq_put_driver_tag(nxt);
>
> meantime 'nxt' need to be cleared inside the 'if (list_empty(list))'
> before .queue_rq().
I had ever thought about that, but to avoid add extra command in the
fast path, I made the patch above.
Thanks
Jianchao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists