[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874ls6kjbw.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:02:11 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:platform/x86:Use ARRAY_SIZE() for the size calculation of the array.
Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c
> index d4fc42b..6b63b3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_telemetry_debugfs.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
> #define TELEM_IOSS_DX_D0IX_EVTS 25
> #define TELEM_IOSS_PG_EVTS 30
>
> -#define TELEM_EVT_LEN(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof((x)[0]))
> +#define TELEM_EVT_LEN(x) ARRAY_SIZE(x)
>
> #define TELEM_DEBUGFS_CPU(model, data) \
> { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (unsigned long)&data}
What's the point? Why not simply replace all instances of TELEM_EVT_LEN
with ARRAY_SIZE?
Bjørn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists