lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170913015425.GA607@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:54:25 +0800
From:   "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly?

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:33:50AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 06:10:35PM +0800, Du, Changbin escreveu:
> > When a annotate a symbol, I find the annotated C source code doesn't match assembly code.
> > So I cannot determine which line of C code has much overhead withou gdb's help.
> > 
> > Here is a example result of function apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr() in kvm module.
> 
> Ok, was this using the module .ko file or /proc/kcore? You forgot to
> cut'n'paste the first line on the screen.
> 
It is arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko.

> Also, how did you use gdb?
> 
$ gdb arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko
$ (gdb) disassemble /s apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr

> perf uses objdump to do the disassembly, and depending on how it is used
> (live system, post processing on a different machine, permissions) it
> may use different files to do the disassembly.
> 
But objdump has same out as gdb. (Always on same machine, and no binary changed.)

$ objdump -d -S arch/x86/kvm/kvm.o
...
static int apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 ppr)
{
   3b4a0:	e8 00 00 00 00       	callq  3b4a5 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+0x5>
   3b4a5:	55                   	push   %rbp
   3b4a6:	48 89 e5             	mov    %rsp,%rbp
   3b4a9:	48 83 ec 08          	sub    $0x8,%rsp
	int highest_irr;
	if (kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr && apic->vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
   3b4ad:	48 8b 05 00 00 00 00 	mov    0x0(%rip),%rax        # 3b4b4 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+0x14>
   3b4b4:	48 8b 80 38 02 00 00 	mov    0x238(%rax),%rax
   3b4bb:	48 85 c0             	test   %rax,%rax
   3b4be:	74 10                	je     3b4d0 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+0x30>
   3b4c0:	48 8b 97 88 00 00 00 	mov    0x88(%rdi),%rdx
   3b4c7:	80 ba 28 03 00 00 00 	cmpb   $0x0,0x328(%rdx)
   3b4ce:	75 3a                	jne    3b50a <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+0x6a>

	/*
	 * Note that irr_pending is just a hint. It will be always
	 * true with virtual interrupt delivery enabled.
	 */
	if (!apic->irr_pending)
   3b4d0:	80 bf 91 00 00 00 00 	cmpb   $0x0,0x91(%rdi)
   3b4d7:	74 2a                	je     3b503 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+0x63>
   3b4d9:	48 8b 8f a0 00 00 00 	mov    0xa0(%rdi),%rcx
static int find_highest_vector(void *bitmap)
{
	int vec;
	u32 *reg;

	for (vec = MAX_APIC_VECTOR - APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG;
   3b4e0:	b8 e0 00 00 00       	mov    $0xe0,%eax
	     vec >= 0; vec -= APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG) {
		reg = bitmap + REG_POS(vec);
		if (*reg)
   3b4e5:	89 c2                	mov    %eax,%edx
   3b4e7:	c1 fa 05             	sar    $0x5,%edx
   3b4ea:	c1 e2 04             	shl    $0x4,%edx
   3b4ed:	48 63 d2             	movslq %edx,%rdx
   3b4f0:	8b 94 11 00 02 00 00 	mov    0x200(%rcx,%rdx,1),%edx
   3b4f7:	85 d2                	test   %edx,%edx
   3b4f9:	75 2d                	jne    3b528 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+0x88>



> Please provide more detailed information on the exact command line
> arguments and usage scenario.
>  
> - Arnaldo

> 
> >        │580         __clear_bit(KVM_APIC_PV_EOI_PENDING, &vcpu->arch.apic_attention);    ▒
> >        │581 }                                                                            ▒
> >        │                                                                                 ▒
> >        │583 static int apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u32 ppr)       ▒
> >        │584 {                                                                            ▒
> >   0.88 │30:   cmpb   $0x0,0x91(%rdi)                                                     ▒
> >   2.54 │    ↓ je     63                                                                  ▒
> >   0.20 │      mov    0xa0(%rdi),%rcx                                                     ▒
> >        │581         int highest_irr;                                                     ▒
> >        │582         if (kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr && apic->vcpu->arch.apicv_active)   ▒
> >   4.91 │      mov    $0xe0,%eax                       x                                   ▒
> >   1.46 │45:   mov    %eax,%edx                        x                                   ▒
> >   0.02 │      sar    $0x5,%edx                        x                                   ▒
> >   3.57 │      shl    $0x4,%edx                        x                                   ▒
> >   3.34 │      movslq %edx,%rdx                        x                                   ▒
> >   1.25 │      mov    0x200(%rcx,%rdx,1),%edx          x                                   ▒
> >  42.44 │      test   %edx,%edx                        x                                   ▒
> >   0.01 │   ┌──jne    88                               x                                   ▒
> >   3.48 │   │  sub    $0x20,%eax                       x                                   ▒
> >   2.24 │   │  cmp    $0xffffffe0,%eax                 x                                   ▒
> >        │586│apic_find_highest_irr():                                                     ▒
> >        │   │                                                                             ▒
> >        │407│        /*                                                                   ▒
> >        │408│         * Note that irr_pending is just a hint. It will be always           ▒
> >        │409│         * true with virtual interrupt delivery enabled.                     ▒
> >        │410│         */                                                                  ▒
> >        │411│        if (!apic->irr_pending)                                              ▒
> >        │   │↑ jne    45                                                                  ▒
> >   0.62 │63:│  mov    $0xffffffff,%eax                                                    ◆
> >   0.83 │   │  leaveq                                                                     ▒
> >  13.52 │   │← retq                                                                       ▒
> >        │6a:│  mov    %esi,-0x4(%rbp)                                                     ▒
> >        │   │  mov    %rdx,%rdi                                                           ▒
> >        │418│find_highest_vector():                                                       ▒
> >        │340│static int find_highest_vector(void *bitmap)                                 ▒
> >        │341│{                                                                            ▒
> >        │342│        int vec;                                                             ▒
> >        │343│        u32 *reg;                                                            ▒
> >        │   │                                                                             ▒
> >        │345│        for (vec = MAX_APIC_VECTOR - APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG;                   ▒
> >        │   │→ callq  *%rax                                                               ▒
> >        │   │  mov    -0x4(%rbp),%esi                                                     ▒
> >        │343│             vec >= 0; vec -= APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG) {                        ▒
> >        │344│                reg = bitmap + REG_POS(vec);                                 ▒
> >        │345│                if (*reg)                                                    ▒
> >   0.05 │75:│  cmp    $0xffffffff,%eax                                                    ▒
> >        │   │↑ je     63                                                                  ▒
> >   1.95 │   │  mov    %eax,%edx                                                           ▒
> >   1.45 │   │  and    $0xf0,%edx                                                          
> > 
> > 
> > Look at the assembly code block where I have put a 'x' on the right. Apparently the
> > assembly code doesn't match the C source code arrounded. Let's look the correct disassemble
> > result from gdb:
> > 
> > 340		for (vec = MAX_APIC_VECTOR - APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG;
> >    0x000000000003b4e0 <+64>:	mov    $0xe0,%eax
> > 
> > 342			reg = bitmap + REG_POS(vec);
> > 343			if (*reg)
> >    0x000000000003b4e5 <+69>:	mov    %eax,%edx
> >    0x000000000003b4e7 <+71>:	sar    $0x5,%edx
> >    0x000000000003b4ea <+74>:	shl    $0x4,%edx
> >    0x000000000003b4ed <+77>:	movslq %edx,%rdx
> >    0x000000000003b4f0 <+80>:	mov    0x200(%rcx,%rdx,1),%edx
> >    0x000000000003b4f7 <+87>:	test   %edx,%edx
> >    0x000000000003b4f9 <+89>:	jne    0x3b528 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+136>
> > 
> > 341		     vec >= 0; vec -= APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG) {
> >    0x000000000003b4fb <+91>:	sub    $0x20,%eax
> > 
> > 340		for (vec = MAX_APIC_VECTOR - APIC_VECTORS_PER_REG;
> >    0x000000000003b4fe <+94>:	cmp    $0xffffffe0,%eax
> >    0x000000000003b501 <+97>:	jne    0x3b4e5 <apic_has_interrupt_for_ppr+69>
> > 
> > 
> > Compared to gdb, perf-annoate has messed up. is it a bug or just perf is not as perfect as gdb?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thanks,
> > Changbin Du
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ