[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a5702c8-a60a-7836-6eec-891a3c3e8ace@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:14:20 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
\"Radim Krčmář\" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Part2 PATCH v3 11/26] KVM: X86: Extend struct kvm_arch to
include SEV information
On 09/13/2017 08:37 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...
>> + return &kvm->arch.sev_info;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void sev_set_active(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + to_sev_info(kvm)->active = true;
>> +}
>
> Is this the accepted way to do this in KVM land or can you simply access
> all members directly:
>
> kvm->arch.sev_info.<member>
>
> Because I see stuff like that:
>
Actually, I see both approaches used in svm.c but I am flexible to go with
either ways. lets wait for Paolo and Radim comments.
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists