lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gE7FuT43B-J7gXatpKjKbUc_7525mUaHEVW5A-Lr7OAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:22:24 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brd: fix overflow in __brd_direct_access

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:
> The code in __brd_direct_access multiplies the pgoff variable by page size
> and divides it by 512. It can cause overflow on 32-bit architectures. The
> overflow happens if we create ramdisk larger than 4G and use it as a
> sparse device.
>
> This patch replaces multiplication and division with multiplication by the
> number of sectors per page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
> Fixes: 1647b9b959c7 ("brd: add dax_operations support")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org      # 4.12+
>
> ---
>  drivers/block/brd.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-4.13/drivers/block/brd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-4.13.orig/drivers/block/brd.c
> +++ linux-4.13/drivers/block/brd.c
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static long __brd_direct_access(struct b
>
>         if (!brd)
>                 return -ENODEV;
> -       page = brd_insert_page(brd, PFN_PHYS(pgoff) / 512);
> +       page = brd_insert_page(brd, (sector_t)pgoff << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT);

Looks good to me, you can add:

Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ