[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170913175232.599fc822@archlinux>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:52:32 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: dln2-adc: initialize local struct before
using it
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:01:27 +0200
Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de> wrote:
> Am 12.09.2017 03:32 schrieb kbuild test robot:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on iio/togreg]
> > [also build test WARNING on next-20170911]
> > [cannot apply to v4.13]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note
> > to help improve the system]
> >
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Martin-Kepplinger/iio-adc-dln2-adc-initialize-local-struct-before-using-it/20170912-064250
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git
> > togreg
> > config: tile-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: tilegx-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.6.2
> > reproduce:
> > wget
> > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
> > -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > make.cross ARCH=tile
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c: In function 'dln2_adc_trigger_h':
> >>> drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c:492:2: warning: missing braces around
> >>> initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
> > drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c:492:2: warning: (near initialization for
> > 'data.values') [-Wmissing-braces]
> >
> > vim +492 drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c
> >
> > 484
> > 485 static irqreturn_t dln2_adc_trigger_h(int irq, void *p)
> > 486 {
> > 487 struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
> > 488 struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> > 489 struct {
> > 490 __le16 values[DLN2_ADC_MAX_CHANNELS];
> > 491 int64_t timestamp_space;
> > > 492 } data = { 0 };
>
>
> ok :) I guess
>
> } data = {{ 0 }};
>
> would be ok for gcc in this case. How far has this patch gone? Do you
> want a fix
> on top or the patch re-done? Or do you just do it yourself?
>
I'm unconvinced the patch is necessary as I think all elements of
that structure are initialized anyway before they are used.
I might be missing a code path where that isn't true though so
feel free to point one out!
Jonathan
> thanks,
>
> martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists