[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170913200824.28067-8-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:08:24 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: npiggin@...il.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] kvm,mips: Fix potential swait_active() races
For example, the following could occur, making us miss a wakeup:
CPU0 CPU1
kvm_vcpu_block kvm_mips_comparecount_func
[L] swait_active(&vcpu->wq)
[S] prepare_to_swait(&vcpu->wq)
[L] if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pending_timer(vcpu))
schedule() [S] queue_timer_int(vcpu)
Ensure that the swait_active() check is not hoisted over the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index bce2a6431430..d535edc01434 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
dvcpu->arch.wait = 0;
- if (swait_active(&dvcpu->wq))
+ if (swq_has_sleeper(&dvcpu->wq))
swake_up(&dvcpu->wq);
return 0;
@@ -1179,7 +1179,7 @@ static void kvm_mips_comparecount_func(unsigned long data)
kvm_mips_callbacks->queue_timer_int(vcpu);
vcpu->arch.wait = 0;
- if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq))
+ if (swq_has_sleeper(&vcpu->wq))
swake_up(&vcpu->wq);
}
--
2.12.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists