[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a179c573-334c-e075-199b-78a6ed06e26e@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:45:48 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: nVMX: Fix nested #PF intends to break L1's
vmlauch/vmresume
On 13/09/2017 13:03, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 5280 at /home/kernel/linux/arch/x86/kvm//vmx.c:11394 nested_vmx_vmexit+0xc2b/0xd70 [kvm_intel]
> CPU: 4 PID: 5280 Comm: qemu-system-x86 Tainted: G W OE 4.13.0+ #17
> RIP: 0010:nested_vmx_vmexit+0xc2b/0xd70 [kvm_intel]
> Call Trace:
> ? emulator_read_emulated+0x15/0x20 [kvm]
> ? segmented_read+0xae/0xf0 [kvm]
> vmx_inject_page_fault_nested+0x60/0x70 [kvm_intel]
> ? vmx_inject_page_fault_nested+0x60/0x70 [kvm_intel]
> x86_emulate_instruction+0x733/0x810 [kvm]
> vmx_handle_exit+0x2f4/0xda0 [kvm_intel]
> ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xd2f/0x1c60 [kvm]
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xdab/0x1c60 [kvm]
> ? kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x62/0x230 [kvm]
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x340/0x700 [kvm]
> ? kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x340/0x700 [kvm]
> ? __fget+0xfc/0x210
> do_vfs_ioctl+0xa4/0x6a0
> ? __fget+0x11d/0x210
> SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc2
>
> A nested #PF is triggered during L0 emulating instruction for L2. However, it
> doesn't consider we should not break L1's vmlauch/vmresme. This patch fixes
> it by queuing the #PF exception instead ,requesting an immediate VM exit from
> L2 and keeping the exception for L1 pending for a subsequent nested VM exit.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 4253ade..fda9dd6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -9829,7 +9829,8 @@ static void vmx_inject_page_fault_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> WARN_ON(!is_guest_mode(vcpu));
>
> - if (nested_vmx_is_page_fault_vmexit(vmcs12, fault->error_code)) {
> + if (nested_vmx_is_page_fault_vmexit(vmcs12, fault->error_code) &&
> + !to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending) {
> vmcs12->vm_exit_intr_error_code = fault->error_code;
> nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI,
> PF_VECTOR | INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION |
>
Is vmx_inject_page_fault_nested even needed at all these days?
kvm_inject_page_fault's call to kvm_queue_exception_e should transform
into an L2->L1 vmexit when vmx_check_nested_events is called.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists