[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170913215957.GB19259@castle>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:59:57 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v8 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:46:51PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 15af3da5af02..da2b12ea4667 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2661,6 +2661,231 @@ static inline bool memcg_has_children(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static long memcg_oom_badness(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > + const nodemask_t *nodemask,
> > + unsigned long totalpages)
> > +{
> > + long points = 0;
> > + int nid;
> > + pg_data_t *pgdat;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We don't have necessary stats for the root memcg,
> > + * so we define it's oom_score as the maximum oom_score
> > + * of the belonging tasks.
> > + */
> > + if (memcg == root_mem_cgroup) {
> > + struct css_task_iter it;
> > + struct task_struct *task;
> > + long score, max_score = 0;
> > +
> > + css_task_iter_start(&memcg->css, 0, &it);
> > + while ((task = css_task_iter_next(&it))) {
> > + score = oom_badness(task, memcg, nodemask,
> > + totalpages);
> > + if (max_score > score)
>
> score > max_score
Ups. Fixed. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists