linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce UMOUNT_WAIT which waits for umount completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170913234437.GO5426@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:44:37 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce UMOUNT_WAIT which waits for umount
 completion

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 04:31:16PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Al,
> 
> On 09/14, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 01:09:41PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > +	if (!retval && (flags & UMOUNT_WAIT)) {
> > > +		if (likely(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
> > > +			task_work_run();
> > 
> > This is complete crap.  The same damn thing will be done by
> > caller of sys_umount() pretty much immediately afterwards.
> > I'm not sure what it is that you are trying to paper over,
> > but this is just plain wrong.
> 
> Okay.
> 
> > What _is_ the semantics of UMOUNT_WAIT?  What does it guarantee,
> > and what would be supplying it to umount(2)?
> 
> When android tries to reboot the system, it calls umount(2) without any flag.
> Then, mntput_no_expire() will add delayed_mntput_work() which finally does
> cleanup_mnt() later. In the mean time, android proceeded to shutdown all
> the UFS devices.

Why has task_work_add() failed?  Or is that umount(2) issued by a kernel thread?