linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier usages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F613760F4@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:01:55 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier
 usages

> let's hear from ia64 and ppc64 guys.

If you write a patch, I can try it on some ia64 h/w.

Please include some test cases (perhaps as a second patch that adds a few good/bad %pF and %pS
to some code (both in base kernel, and in a module).

-Tony