lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F613760F4@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:01:55 +0000 From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com> To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/14] Fix wrong %pF and %pS printk format specifier usages > let's hear from ia64 and ppc64 guys. If you write a patch, I can try it on some ia64 h/w. Please include some test cases (perhaps as a second patch that adds a few good/bad %pF and %pS to some code (both in base kernel, and in a module). -Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists