linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sched/wait: Introduce lock breaker in wake_up_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709141138340.30688@nuc-kabylake>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:39:53 -0500 (CDT)
From:   Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sched/wait: Introduce lock breaker in
 wake_up_page_bit

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Tim Chen wrote:

> Here's what the customer think happened and is willing to tell us.
> They have a parent process that spawns off 10 children per core and
> kicked them to run. The child processes all access a common library.
> We have 384 cores so 3840 child processes running.  When migration occur on
> a page in the common library, the first child that access the page will
> page fault and lock the page, with the other children also page faulting
> quickly and pile up in the page wait list, till the first child is done.

I think we need some way to avoid migration in cases like this. This is
crazy. Page migration was not written to deal with something like this.