[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170914000908.713-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:09:08 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: vbabka@...e.cz, parri.andrea@...il.com, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH] mm,compaction: serialize waitqueue_active() checks (for real)
Andrea brought to my attention that the L->{L,S} guarantees
are completely bogus for this case. I was looking at the diagram,
from the offending commit, when that _is_ the race, we had the
load reordered already.
What we need is at least S->L semantics, thus simply use
wq_has_sleeper() to serialize the call for good.
Fixes: 46acef048a6 (mm,compaction: serialize waitqueue_active() checks)
Reported-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
mm/compaction.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index fb548e4c7bd4..d1ad2cf6c758 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -1999,17 +1999,16 @@ void wakeup_kcompactd(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
if (pgdat->kcompactd_max_order < order)
pgdat->kcompactd_max_order = order;
- /*
- * Pairs with implicit barrier in wait_event_freezable()
- * such that wakeups are not missed in the lockless
- * waitqueue_active() call.
- */
smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
if (pgdat->kcompactd_classzone_idx > classzone_idx)
pgdat->kcompactd_classzone_idx = classzone_idx;
- if (!waitqueue_active(&pgdat->kcompactd_wait))
+ /*
+ * Pairs with implicit barrier in wait_event_freezable()
+ * such that wakeups are not missed.
+ */
+ if (!wq_has_sleeper(&pgdat->kcompactd_wait))
return;
if (!kcompactd_node_suitable(pgdat))
--
2.12.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists