[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <baa5a2e5-9a20-3baa-2156-3d00c2445541@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:53:13 +0800
From: "Yang Shi" <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: slab: output reclaimable flag in /proc/slabinfo
On 9/14/17 10:27 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> Well /proc/slabinfo is a legacy interface. The infomation if a slab is
> reclaimable is available via the slabinfo tool. We would break a format
> that is relied upon by numerous tools.
Thanks for pointing this out. It would be unacceptable if it would break
the backward compatibility.
A follow-up question is do we know what tools rely on the slabinfo format?
From my point of view, although /proc/slabinfo is legacy, it sounds it
is still used very often by the users.
Thanks,
Yang
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists