linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] arch:powerpc: return -ENOMEM on failed allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMdWSJvQMNJSnfekmM=N-CCaaJF_3HkP8ypZG+vWgWf0gWgfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:13:38 +0530
From:   Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] arch:powerpc: return -ENOMEM on failed allocation

> I think the changelog for this series of conversions
> should show that you've validated the change by
> inspecting the return call chain at each modified line.
>
> Also, it seems you've cc'd the same mailing lists for
> all of the patches modified by this series.
>
> It would be better to individually address each patch
> in the series only cc'ing the appropriate maintainers
> and mailing lists.
>
> A cover letter would be good too.

 Point noted. Thanks.

- Allen