[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1505365722-45418-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:08:42 +0800
From: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To: <will.deacon@....com>, <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
<robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<liubo95@...wei.com>, <chenjiankang1@...wei.com>,
<xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Avoid ILLEGAL setting of STE.S1STALLD
According to Spec, it is ILLEGAL to set STE.S1STALLD if STALL_MODEL
is not 0b00, which means we should not disable stall mode if stall
or terminate mode is not configuable.
As Jean-Philippe's suggestion, this patch introduce a feature bit
ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE, which means smmu only supports stall force.
Therefore, we can avoid the ILLEGAL setting of STE.S1STALLD.by checking
ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE.
This patch keeps the ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS as the meaning of stall supported
(force or configuable) to easy to expand the future function, i.e. we can
only use ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS to check whether we should register fault
handle or enable master can_stall, etc to supporte platform SVM.
After apply this patch, the feature bit and S1STALLD setting will be like:
STALL_MODEL FEATURE S1STALLD
0b00 ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS 0b1
0b01 !ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS && !ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE 0b0
0b10 ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS && ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE 0b0
Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index e67ba6c..d2a3627 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -603,7 +603,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S1 (1 << 9)
#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_TRANS_S2 (1 << 10)
#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS (1 << 11)
-#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HYP (1 << 12)
+#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE (1 << 12)
+#define ARM_SMMU_FEAT_HYP (1 << 13)
u32 features;
#define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH (1 << 0)
@@ -1112,7 +1113,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid,
#endif
STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1 << STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_SHIFT);
- if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS)
+ if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
+ !(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE))
dst[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
val |= (ste->s1_cfg->cdptr_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK
@@ -2536,9 +2538,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
coherent ? "true" : "false");
switch (reg & IDR0_STALL_MODEL_MASK << IDR0_STALL_MODEL_SHIFT) {
- case IDR0_STALL_MODEL_STALL:
- /* Fallthrough */
case IDR0_STALL_MODEL_FORCE:
+ smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALL_FORCE;
+ /* Fallthrough */
+ case IDR0_STALL_MODEL_STALL:
smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS;
}
--
1.7.12.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists