linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <34017292-5BDF-4218-8144-695088D12AF3@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:19:20 +0800
From:   严海双 <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Luca BRUNO <lucab@...ian.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ipv4: Namespaceify tcp_fastopen knob



> On 2017年9月13日, at 下午9:02, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 05:44 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 19:19 +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
>>> Different namespace application might require enable TCP Fast Open
>>> feature independently of the host.
>>> 
>> 
>> Poor changelog, no actual description / list of sysctls that are moved
>> to per netns.
>> 
>> And looking at the patch, it seems your conversion is not complete.
>> 
>> So I will ask you to provide more evidence that you tested your patch
>> next time you submit it.
> 
> I suggest you move one sysctl at a time, in a patch series.
> 
> It will be easier to document and test for you, and review for us.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Okay, I will split my patch for each sysctl change. Thanks.