linux-kernel - Re: New ML for TPM and IMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1505497214.27581.9.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:40:14 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New ML for TPM and IMA

On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:36 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
[]
> > > We decided to create a new mailing list linux-integrit@...r.kernel.org
> > > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies.
[]
> > And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries?
[]
> Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the
> MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those?

As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections,
I think you need both entries.