[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1505498511.27581.11.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:01:51 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] New ML for TPM and IMA
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:57 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:47:06AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote:
> > Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> > > As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections,
> > > I think you need both entries.
> >
> > Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining.
> >
> > While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm.
> >
> > You can keep me for now :)
> > Peter
>
> During the last bit less than couple of years I've been maintaining
> TPM and a bit less than four years I've been contributing I've never
> heard anything of Ashley.
>
> What is the expiration time?
There is no fixed time at all.
Generally when the email bounces or when the maintainer resigns.
(involuntarily or not...)
It seems a couple years since Ashley signed anything and five years
since Marcel Selhorst signed anything.
It's polite to add a CREDITS entry when removing inactive maintainers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists