[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537BF1DD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:26:23 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC V2 00/10] perf top optimization
> Em Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 05:29:13PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > Em Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 03:11:51PM +0000, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> > > > They are small fixes. I think it's better to merge them with the old
> patches.
> > > > Should I include the modified hashtable patches in V3?
>
> > > I'll add these now and test, then push another branch, ok?
>
> > Sure. Thanks.
> > I will prepare the V3 for the new branch then.
>
> Ok, passes all the tests I trew at them, including 'perf test' and building in
> several distro containers.
>
> I just pushed perf/core, please continue from there, ok?
>
Sure.
Thanks,
Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists