[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170916123418.37807-7-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 07:34:07 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: [Part1 PATCH v4 06/17] x86/mm: Include SEV for encryption memory attribute changes
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
The current code checks only for sme_active() when determining whether
to perform the encryption attribute change. Include sev_active() in this
check so that memory attribute changes can occur under SME and SEV.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
---
arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
index dfb7d657cf43..3fe68483463c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -1781,8 +1781,8 @@ static int __set_memory_enc_dec(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc)
unsigned long start;
int ret;
- /* Nothing to do if the SME is not active */
- if (!sme_active())
+ /* Nothing to do if memory encryption is not active */
+ if (!mem_encrypt_active())
return 0;
/* Should not be working on unaligned addresses */
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists