linux-kernel - Re: RTL8192EE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter crashed with linux-4.13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5e2a695a-ea26-e0a3-d5eb-cf8135c1349e@lwfinger.net>
Date:   Sat, 16 Sep 2017 12:26:14 -0500
From:   Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:     Zwindl <zwindl@...tonmail.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn" <chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn>,
        "kvalo@...eaurora.org" <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "pkshih@...ltek.com" <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        "johannes.berg@...el.com" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RTL8192EE PCIe Wireless Network Adapter crashed with linux-4.13

On 09/16/2017 06:27 AM, Zwindl wrote:
> Hi, I've done the test, and the weird thing happened. The kernel buit with this 
> config file https://ptpb.pw/HF1g which is from 
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-git/  can run properly, the wifi can 
> connect, despite which version it is, but, with this config file 
> https://ptpb.pw/7GuV which comes from the archlinux's official package build 
> repo(linux-package 
> <https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/linux>), 
> all the version begin with 4.13 was failed to connect wifi.
> So, I think the issue is not caused by the kernel code, is caused by some 
> options in the config file, but I can't fully understand the meaning of these 
> options so that I can't determine which option caused that issue, what should I 
> do now, maybe report this bug to archlinux's maintainer?
> By the way, maybe I'll lost internet connection tomorrow, it's time to back to 
> university, but I'm happy to help to push the debug progress.

Yes, you need to report this to archlinux's bugzilla or maintainer, whichever is 
appropriate. I have seen a configuration error cause some feature to be silently 
missing, but leading to a WARN is rare.

I looked at your two configurations, but did not see a definitive difference.

Larry