lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 16 Sep 2017 11:23:50 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: d57108d4f6 ("watchdog/core: Get rid of the thread .."): BUG:
 unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000208

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> So I suspect your perf fix is the right one, and maybe we could/should
>> just make people more aware of the empty cpumask issue with UP.
>
> Right, I just got a bit frightened as I really was not aware about that
> 'opmtimization' which means that so far I just was lucky not to trip over
> it.

Yeah. I can't say that I was really aware of it either in a every-day
kind of way, it was only when I looked it up that I went "Oh, right,
that's what we did".

So it's subtle and unexpected, and the saving grace is basically that
empty cpumasks are really the exception to begin with. They basically
don't happen in normal situations.

               Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists