[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170916052626.GA3704@Asurada>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:26:28 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
thierry.reding@...il.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, pgaikwad@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic in
tegra210_clock_init
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:31:45PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Apart from the typo in the commit message (preemption rather than preemtion):
Sent a v2 to correct it. And included your Acked-by.
Thanks
>
> Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 06:36:14PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Below is the call trace of tegra210_init_pllu() function:
> > start_kernel()
> > -> time_init()
> > --> of_clk_init()
> > ---> tegra210_clock_init()
> > ----> tegra210_pll_init()
> > -----> tegra210_init_pllu()
> >
> > Because the preemtion is disabled in the start_kernel before calling
> > time_init, tegra210_init_pllu is actually in an atomic context while
> > it includes a readl_relaxed_poll_timeout that might sleep.
> >
> > So this patch just changes this readl_relaxed_poll_timeout() to its
> > atomic version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > index 0b9789a..ea695c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > @@ -2587,8 +2587,8 @@ static int tegra210_enable_pllu(void)
> > reg |= PLL_ENABLE;
> > writel(reg, clk_base + PLLU_BASE);
> >
> > - readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(clk_base + PLLU_BASE, reg,
> > - reg & PLL_BASE_LOCK, 2, 1000);
> > + readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(clk_base + PLLU_BASE, reg,
> > + reg & PLL_BASE_LOCK, 2, 1000);
> > if (!(reg & PLL_BASE_LOCK)) {
> > pr_err("Timed out waiting for PLL_U to lock\n");
> > return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists