linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/4] arm64: allwinner: h5: add compatible string for DE2 CCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:35:37 +1000
From:   Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:     icenowy@...c.io
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Mailing List, Arm" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/4] arm64: allwinner: h5: add compatible
 string for DE2 CCU

Hi Icenowy,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io> wrote:
> The DE2 CCU on Allwinner H5 SoC has a slightly different behavior than
> the one on H3, so the compatible string is not set in the common DTSI
> file.
>
> Add the compatible string of H5 DE2 CCU in H5 DTSI file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> index d9a720bff05d..e237c05cfdb4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@
>         compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-ccu";
>  };
>
> +&display_clocks {
> +       compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-de2-clk";
> +};
> +

This is what I get for reviewing before reading the full patch set.

Shouldn't this be rolled into the previous patch?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/