lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:11:46 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 37/78] xfs: dont allow bmap on rt files

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

commit 61d819e7bcb7f33da710bf3f5dcb2bcf1e48203c upstream.

bmap returns a dumb LBA address but not the block device that goes with
that LBA.  Swapfiles don't care about this and will blindly assume that
the data volume is the correct blockdev, which is totally bogus for
files on the rt subvolume.  This results in the swap code doing IOs to
arbitrary locations on the data device(!) if the passed in mapping is a
realtime file, so just turn off bmap for rt files.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>


---
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c |    7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -1566,9 +1566,12 @@ xfs_vm_bmap(
 	 * The swap code (ab-)uses ->bmap to get a block mapping and then
 	 * bypasseѕ the file system for actual I/O.  We really can't allow
 	 * that on reflinks inodes, so we have to skip out here.  And yes,
-	 * 0 is the magic code for a bmap error..
+	 * 0 is the magic code for a bmap error.
+	 *
+	 * Since we don't pass back blockdev info, we can't return bmap
+	 * information for rt files either.
 	 */
-	if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {
+	if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip) || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip)) {
 		xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
 		return 0;
 	}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ