linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.13 39/52] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:10:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.13 39/52] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted

4.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>

commit e9385cc6fb7edf23702de33a2dc82965d92d9392 upstream.

Ordered buffers pass through the logging infrastructure without ever
being written to the log. The way this works is that the ordered
buffer status is transferred to the log vector at commit time via
the ->iop_size() callback. In xlog_cil_insert_format_items(),
ordered log vectors bypass ->iop_format() processing altogether.

Therefore it is unnecessary for xfs_buf_item_format() to handle
ordered buffers. Remove the unnecessary logic and assert that an
ordered buffer never reaches this point.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c |   12 ++----------
 fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h    |    1 -
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
@@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ xfs_buf_item_format(
 	ASSERT((bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) ||
 	       (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF
 	        && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF));
+	ASSERT(!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED) ||
+	       (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE));
 
 
 	/*
@@ -347,16 +349,6 @@ xfs_buf_item_format(
 		bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_INODE_BUF;
 	}
 
-	if ((bip->bli_flags & (XFS_BLI_ORDERED|XFS_BLI_STALE)) ==
-							XFS_BLI_ORDERED) {
-		/*
-		 * The buffer has been logged just to order it.  It is not being
-		 * included in the transaction commit, so don't format it.
-		 */
-		trace_xfs_buf_item_format_ordered(bip);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
 		xfs_buf_item_format_segment(bip, lv, &vecp, offset,
 					    &bip->bli_formats[i]);
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
@@ -517,7 +517,6 @@ DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size)
 DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size_ordered);
 DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size_stale);
 DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format);
-DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format_ordered);
 DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format_stale);
 DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_ordered);
 DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_pin);