lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:10:07 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Subject: [PATCH 4.13 39/52] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted 4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com> commit e9385cc6fb7edf23702de33a2dc82965d92d9392 upstream. Ordered buffers pass through the logging infrastructure without ever being written to the log. The way this works is that the ordered buffer status is transferred to the log vector at commit time via the ->iop_size() callback. In xlog_cil_insert_format_items(), ordered log vectors bypass ->iop_format() processing altogether. Therefore it is unnecessary for xfs_buf_item_format() to handle ordered buffers. Remove the unnecessary logic and assert that an ordered buffer never reaches this point. Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 12 ++---------- fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c @@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ xfs_buf_item_format( ASSERT((bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) || (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF)); + ASSERT(!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED) || + (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE)); /* @@ -347,16 +349,6 @@ xfs_buf_item_format( bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_INODE_BUF; } - if ((bip->bli_flags & (XFS_BLI_ORDERED|XFS_BLI_STALE)) == - XFS_BLI_ORDERED) { - /* - * The buffer has been logged just to order it. It is not being - * included in the transaction commit, so don't format it. - */ - trace_xfs_buf_item_format_ordered(bip); - return; - } - for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) { xfs_buf_item_format_segment(bip, lv, &vecp, offset, &bip->bli_formats[i]); --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h @@ -517,7 +517,6 @@ DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size) DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size_ordered); DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size_stale); DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format); -DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format_ordered); DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format_stale); DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_ordered); DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_pin);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists