lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:38:03 +0200 From: Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>, Ashley Lai <ashleydlai@...il.com>, Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@....de, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, tpmdd@...horst.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: parse TPM event logs based on EFI table On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:47:50AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:00:22PM +0200, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote: >> >> > chip->bin_log_seqops.chip = chip; >> > - if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) >> > + >> > + if (log_version == EFI_TCG2_EVENT_LOG_FORMAT_TCG_2 || >> > + (!log_version && (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2))) >> > chip->bin_log_seqops.seqops = >> > &tpm2_binary_b_measurements_seqops; >> >> Lets have all the read_log_* versions return the postitive log_version >> and get rid of the chip->flags check here. >> >> ie Doesn't ACPI always return the TPM 1 version? > > That is my understanding. Ashley, Nayna, could you confirm the format > version expected by tpm_of? Could it be both? > I've changed the returned code for ACPI but not for DeviceTree. Without confirmation for tpm_of, I am reluctant to modify the current behaviour. >> >> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists