lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:07:17 +0900
From:   Joonsoo Kim <>
To:     Pali Rohár <>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <>, Pavel Machek <>,, kernel list <>,
        linux-arm-kernel <>,,,,,,,,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <>,
        Vlastimil Babka <>,
        Andrew Morton <>,
        Stephen Rothwell <>,
        Russell King <>
Subject: Re: n900 in next-20170901


On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 03:28:44PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2017 16:30:38 Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > If it doesn't help, is there a way to test n900 configuration in QEMU?
> Hi Joonsoo, linaro version of QEMU has support for n900 machine. For
> more information how to prepare & run kernel image see this email:
> (instead u-boot.bin you would supply kernel's zImage)

I tried to search to download required tools but cannot find a qflasher.
Looks like you have qflasher and other *.bin for n900 image.
Could you share them to me, please?

> But QEMU does not support HS mode, so there is probably no secure ram.
> IIRC smc instructions should not be used in normal GP mode.

Okay. Thanks for information. I'm not sure that I can regenerate the
error with n900 QEMU emulation but that would be my best so I will


Powered by blists - more mailing lists