[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1505701349.12022.1.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 19:22:29 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: printk: what is going on with additional newlines?
On Mon, 2017-09-18 at 09:46 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> there is another reason why I think that, yes, we probably better do
> it some other way. and the reason is that not every message that looks
> like !PREFIX (does not start with KERN_SOH_ASCII) is _actually_ a
> !PREFIX message. the normal/usual way is to have something like
>
> printk(KERN_SOH_ASCII %d " foo bar / %s %s\n", "foo", "bar");
>
> but some messages look like
>
> printk("%s", KERN_SOH_ASCII %d "foo bar\n");
There are no messages that look like that.
There are 2 entries somewhat like that though
net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_log.c: printk(KERN_SOH "%c%s IN=%s OUT=%s MAC source = %pM MAC dest = %pM proto = 0x%04x",
net/netfilter/nf_log_common.c: nf_log_buf_add(m, KERN_SOH "%c%sIN=%s OUT=%s ",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists