[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD0078B30@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:10:34 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Eric Dumazet' <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: 'Colin King' <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net_sched: use explicit size of struct tcmsg, remove
need to declare tcm
From: Eric Dumazet
> Sent: 18 September 2017 16:01
...
> > > - err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(*tcm), tca, TCA_MAX, NULL, NULL);
> > > + err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(struct tcmsg), tca, TCA_MAX, NULL, NULL);
> >
> > Would sizeof(*nlmsg_data(nlh)) be cleaner??
>
> Not really, since
>
> static inline void *nlmsg_data(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
I thought about that after posting :-(
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists