[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170918052051.GA29118@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:20:51 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] scsi: Align queue to ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in
non-coherent DMA mode
Please send all patches in the series to the same to and cc lists.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:22:54PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> In non-coherent DMA mode, kernel uses cache flushing operations to
> maintain I/O coherency, so scsi's block queue should be aligned to
> ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. Otherwise, it will cause data corruption, at least
> on MIPS:
>
> Step 1, dma_map_single
> Step 2, cache_invalidate (no writeback)
> Step 3, dma_from_device
> Step 4, dma_unmap_single
>
> If a DMA buffer and a kernel structure share a same cache line, and if
> the kernel structure has dirty data, cache_invalidate (no writeback)
> will cause data lost.
And as said before we must _always_ align to dma_get_cache_alignment.
This is even documented in Documentation/DMA-API.txt:
------------------------------ snip ------------------------------
int
dma_get_cache_alignment(void)
Returns the processor cache alignment. This is the absolute minimum
alignment *and* width that you must observe when either mapping
memory or doing partial flushes.
------------------------------ snip ------------------------------
> + if (device_is_coherent(dev))
> + blk_queue_dma_alignment(q, 0x04 - 1);
> + else
> + blk_queue_dma_alignment(q, dma_get_cache_alignment() - 1);
So as said before this should become something like:
blk_queue_dma_alignment(q, max(0x04, dma_get_cache_alignment()) - 1);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists