[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXSGWkSYnFK3sbJTah1-B=Q8+RZe-7DM7JbbVMkJb=B3aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:53:21 -0500
From: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
To: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/18] fpga: bridge: support getting bridge from device
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 03:48:24PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> Add two functions for getting the FPGA bridge from the device
>> rather than device tree node. This is to enable writing code
>> that will support using FPGA bridges without device tree.
>> Rename one old function to make it clear that it is device
>> tree-ish. This leaves us with 3 functions for getting a bridge:
>>
>> * fpga_bridge_get
>> Get the bridge given the device.
>>
>> * fpga_bridges_get_to_list
>> Given the device, get the bridge and add it to a list.
>>
>> * of_fpga_bridges_get_to_list
>> Renamed from priviously existing fpga_bridges_get_to_list.
>> Given the device node, get the bridge and add it to a list.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> v2: use list_for_each_entry
>> static the bridge_list_lock
>> update copyright and author email
>> v3: no change to this patch in this version of patchset
>> v4: no change to this patch in this version of patchset
>> ---
>> drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c | 11 ++--
>> include/linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h | 7 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
>> index fcd2bd3..af6d97e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> * FPGA Bridge Framework Driver
>> *
>> * Copyright (C) 2013-2016 Altera Corporation, All Rights Reserved.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation
>> *
>> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>> @@ -70,29 +71,12 @@ int fpga_bridge_disable(struct fpga_bridge *bridge)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_disable);
>>
>> -/**
>> - * of_fpga_bridge_get - get an exclusive reference to a fpga bridge
>> - *
>> - * @np: node pointer of a FPGA bridge
>> - * @info: fpga image specific information
>> - *
>> - * Return fpga_bridge struct if successful.
>> - * Return -EBUSY if someone already has a reference to the bridge.
>> - * Return -ENODEV if @np is not a FPGA Bridge.
>> - */
>> -struct fpga_bridge *of_fpga_bridge_get(struct device_node *np,
>> - struct fpga_image_info *info)
>> -
>> +struct fpga_bridge *__fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
>> + struct fpga_image_info *info)
>> {
>> - struct device *dev;
>> struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
>> int ret = -ENODEV;
>>
>> - dev = class_find_device(fpga_bridge_class, NULL, np,
>> - fpga_bridge_of_node_match);
>> - if (!dev)
>> - goto err_dev;
>> -
>> bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
>> if (!bridge)
>> goto err_dev;
>> @@ -117,8 +101,58 @@ struct fpga_bridge *of_fpga_bridge_get(struct device_node *np,
>> put_device(dev);
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * of_fpga_bridge_get - get an exclusive reference to a fpga bridge
>> + *
>> + * @np: node pointer of a FPGA bridge
>> + * @info: fpga image specific information
>> + *
>> + * Return fpga_bridge struct if successful.
>> + * Return -EBUSY if someone already has a reference to the bridge.
>> + * Return -ENODEV if @np is not a FPGA Bridge.
>> + */
>> +struct fpga_bridge *of_fpga_bridge_get(struct device_node *np,
>> + struct fpga_image_info *info)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + dev = class_find_device(fpga_bridge_class, NULL, np,
>> + fpga_bridge_of_node_match);
>> + if (!dev)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> + return __fpga_bridge_get(dev, info);
>> +}
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fpga_bridge_get);
>>
>> +static int fpga_bridge_dev_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>> +{
>> + return dev->parent == data;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * fpga_bridge_get - get an exclusive reference to a fpga bridge
>> + * @dev: parent device that fpga bridge was registered with
>> + *
>> + * Given a device, get an exclusive reference to a fpga bridge.
>> + *
>> + * Return: fpga manager struct or IS_ERR() condition containing error code.
>> + */
>> +struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
>> + struct fpga_image_info *info)
>> +{
>> + struct device *bridge_dev;
>> +
>> + bridge_dev = class_find_device(fpga_bridge_class, NULL, dev,
>> + fpga_bridge_dev_match);
>> + if (!bridge_dev)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> + return __fpga_bridge_get(bridge_dev, info);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_get);
>> +
>> /**
>> * fpga_bridge_put - release a reference to a bridge
>> *
>> @@ -206,7 +240,7 @@ void fpga_bridges_put(struct list_head *bridge_list)
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridges_put);
>>
>> /**
>> - * fpga_bridges_get_to_list - get a bridge, add it to a list
>> + * of_fpga_bridge_get_to_list - get a bridge, add it to a list
>> *
>> * @np: node pointer of a FPGA bridge
>> * @info: fpga image specific information
>> @@ -216,14 +250,44 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridges_put);
>> *
>> * Return 0 for success, error code from of_fpga_bridge_get() othewise.
>> */
>> -int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device_node *np,
>> +int of_fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device_node *np,
>> + struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> + struct list_head *bridge_list)
>> +{
>> + struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + bridge = of_fpga_bridge_get(np, info);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bridge))
>> + return PTR_ERR(bridge);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&bridge_list_lock, flags);
>> + list_add(&bridge->node, bridge_list);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bridge_list_lock, flags);
>
> I know this is not new code, but I was wondering the other day:
>
> Why are we using a single spinlock to protect all lists that are being
> passed in as parameters here?
>
> I have a patch that moves the spinlock into the region containing the
> list that uses the bridges which (unless I misunderstand something
> here), makes more sense:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> index 9651aa56244a..b03ec59448e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridges_put);
> *
> * Get an exclusive reference to the bridge and and it to the list.
> *
> + * Must be called with list lock held.
> + *
> * Return 0 for success, error code from of_fpga_bridge_get() othewise.
> */
> int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device_node *np,
> @@ -221,15 +223,12 @@ int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device_node *np,
> struct list_head *bridge_list)
> {
> struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> bridge = of_fpga_bridge_get(np, info);
> if (IS_ERR(bridge))
> return PTR_ERR(bridge);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&bridge_list_lock, flags);
> list_add(&bridge->node, bridge_list);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bridge_list_lock, flags);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
> index 3b6b2f4182a1..c5c958e0e601 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct fpga_region {
> struct device dev;
> struct mutex mutex; /* for exclusive reference to region */
> struct list_head bridge_list;
> + spinlock_t bridge_list_lock; /* protects access to bridge list */
> struct fpga_image_info *info;
> };
>
> @@ -180,11 +181,15 @@ static int fpga_region_get_bridges(struct fpga_region *region,
> struct device *dev = ®ion->dev;
> struct device_node *region_np = dev->of_node;
> struct device_node *br, *np, *parent_br = NULL;
> + unsigned long flags;
> int i, ret;
>
> /* If parent is a bridge, add to list */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(®ion->bridge_list_lock, flags);
> ret = fpga_bridge_get_to_list(region_np->parent, region->info,
> ®ion->bridge_list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(®ion->bridge_list_lock, flags);
> +
> if (ret == -EBUSY)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -508,6 +513,7 @@ static int fpga_region_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> mutex_init(®ion->mutex);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(®ion->bridge_list);
> + spin_lock_init(®ion->bridge_list_lock);
>
> device_initialize(®ion->dev);
> region->dev.class = fpga_region_class;
>
> Am I missing something here? If not I"ll send out my patch separately.
Hi Moritz,
You are right! I'll look at your patch.
Alan
>
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fpga_bridge_get_to_list);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * fpga_bridge_get_to_list - given device, get a bridge, add it to a list
>> + *
>> + * @dev: FPGA bridge device
>> + * @info: fpga image specific information
>> + * @bridge_list: list of FPGA bridges
>> + *
>> + * Get an exclusive reference to the bridge and and it to the list.
>> + *
>> + * Return 0 for success, error code from fpga_bridge_get() othewise.
>> + */
>> +int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device *dev,
>> struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> struct list_head *bridge_list)
>> {
>> struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> - bridge = of_fpga_bridge_get(np, info);
>> + bridge = fpga_bridge_get(dev, info);
>> if (IS_ERR(bridge))
>> return PTR_ERR(bridge);
>>
>> @@ -381,7 +445,7 @@ static void __exit fpga_bridge_dev_exit(void)
>> }
>>
>> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FPGA Bridge Driver");
>> -MODULE_AUTHOR("Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>");
>> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>
>> subsys_initcall(fpga_bridge_dev_init);
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
>> index d9ab7c7..91755562 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
>> @@ -183,11 +183,14 @@ static int fpga_region_get_bridges(struct fpga_region *region,
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> /* If parent is a bridge, add to list */
>> - ret = fpga_bridge_get_to_list(region_np->parent, region->info,
>> - ®ion->bridge_list);
>> + ret = of_fpga_bridge_get_to_list(region_np->parent, region->info,
>> + ®ion->bridge_list);
>> +
>> + /* -EBUSY means parent is a bridge that is under use. Give up. */
>> if (ret == -EBUSY)
>> return ret;
>>
>> + /* Zero return code means parent was a bridge and was added to list. */
>> if (!ret)
>> parent_br = region_np->parent;
>>
>> @@ -207,8 +210,8 @@ static int fpga_region_get_bridges(struct fpga_region *region,
>> continue;
>>
>> /* If node is a bridge, get it and add to list */
>> - ret = fpga_bridge_get_to_list(br, region->info,
>> - ®ion->bridge_list);
>> + ret = of_fpga_bridge_get_to_list(br, region->info,
>> + ®ion->bridge_list);
>>
>> /* If any of the bridges are in use, give up */
>> if (ret == -EBUSY) {
>> diff --git a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h
>> index dba6e3c..9f6696b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ struct fpga_bridge {
>>
>> struct fpga_bridge *of_fpga_bridge_get(struct device_node *node,
>> struct fpga_image_info *info);
>> +struct fpga_bridge *fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
>> + struct fpga_image_info *info);
>> void fpga_bridge_put(struct fpga_bridge *bridge);
>> int fpga_bridge_enable(struct fpga_bridge *bridge);
>> int fpga_bridge_disable(struct fpga_bridge *bridge);
>> @@ -49,9 +51,12 @@ int fpga_bridge_disable(struct fpga_bridge *bridge);
>> int fpga_bridges_enable(struct list_head *bridge_list);
>> int fpga_bridges_disable(struct list_head *bridge_list);
>> void fpga_bridges_put(struct list_head *bridge_list);
>> -int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device_node *np,
>> +int fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device *dev,
>> struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> struct list_head *bridge_list);
>> +int of_fpga_bridge_get_to_list(struct device_node *np,
>> + struct fpga_image_info *info,
>> + struct list_head *bridge_list);
>>
>> int fpga_bridge_register(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> const struct fpga_bridge_ops *br_ops, void *priv);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
> Thanks,
>
> Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists